The general election ballot is now set: Republican incumbents Victoria Lods and Douglas Albrecht will face Democratic challengers John Capizola and Yolanda Garcia
Balicki.
This race is notable for both what has changed and what hasn’t. On one hand, Republicans have, over the past few years, been more consistently transparent and
accessible—attending public events and offering opportunities for voters to hear from them directly. On the other hand, with the recent decision to make the
bi-weekly Republican breakfasts Republicans-only, that relative advantage in openness will almost certainly shrink.
For voters, this means we are heading into another election season where getting clear, reliable, and timely information may once again feel like a scavenger hunt.
Part of why this project exists is because there is no centralized, official way to access *comprehensive* candidate and issues-based information when your sample
ballot arrives. What should be a simple afternoon of reviewing 3rd party vetted platforms too often turns into weeks, months, or years of emails, phone calls, and tracking
down events.
Right now, Capizola and Balicki have a low transparency and accessibility rating—but that is easily fixable. Filling out a candidate questionnaire takes an hour or two.
Participating in a radio interview takes another hour. Recording a longer podcast later in the season might take a few more. In other words, with an afternoon’s effort,
they could make sure every Cumberland County voter has free, well-promoted access to their positions before November.
At the same time, while Lods and Albrecht are ahead of the curve thanks to past engagement, there are still four months to go, and anything can happen—politically or
practically. Issues evolve, priorities shift, and if there is no longer an open-door forum for updates, we risk ending up exactly where we started two years ago:
having to invest full-time hours just to be reasonably informed.
If that is genuinely the baseline expectation for civic engagement in 2025—that citizens must piece everything together themselves—we have to ask serious questions
about whether that’s a fair or sustainable system.
In short, this race is wide open in terms of how transparent and responsive it could become. I’ll be watching closely—and doing my best to make sure the voters of
Cumberland County don’t have to do all the work alone.
With the shutting down of newspapers all across the country, information regarding elections is scattered all over the internet and oftentimes appears biased because it is coming from the candidates themselves and their parties. The local paper, The Daily Journal, was absorbed by a parent company and the last reporter in the county retired last year. Without a trusted 3rd party entity providing objective oversight regarding issues facing the county, the public is left woefully uninformed about what is going on, especially in regards to local elections where biased political messaging could be running rampant. While most of the candidates agree we need press coverage, none of them seem to be particularly interested engaging in an action plan to fix the problem for a variety of reasons. One candidate said "With the lack of press coverage, candidates are left to be their own press on social media." While we appreciate the pro-active approach to do something to get information out to the public, this approach could easily lead to the appearance of overwhelming bias and scattered sources of information... who has the time to scour all the candidates social media pages, verify the facts, send follow-up questions that oftentimes go unanswered, attend various events that have entrance fees, etc etc etc? The press, that's who. Another candidate said "If I get involved in forming the local press, it could be viewed as a bias for my party." Understandable, but we are still ultimately left uninformed. The public needs reasonable access to comprehensive, consolidated information regarding election choices. "We'll let the public know what we want them to know", this did not come from a candidate, but rather from a campaign organizer. It's pretty clear that we have a problem, but not necessarily anyone willing to solve it.
( Click or tap on candidate name to learn more about them )
OFFICE TITLE
TITULO OFICIAL
A
Democratic
Democrata
B
Democratic
Democrata
PERSONAL CHOICE
SELECCION PERSONAL
County Commissioners
Vote for Two
Junta Comisionados del Empleados
Vota por Dos
Personal Choice
Seleccion Personal
County Commissioners
Vote for Two
Junta Comisionados del Empleados
Vota por Dos
Personal Choice
Seleccion Personal
OFFICE TITLE
TITULO OFICIAL
A
Republican
Republicano
B
Republican
Republicano
PERSONAL CHOICE
SELECCION PERSONAL
County Commissioners
Vote for Two
Junta Comisionados del Empleados
Vota por Dos
Personal Choice
Seleccion Personal
County Commissioners
Vote for Two
Junta Comisionados del Empleados
Vota por Dos
Personal Choice
Seleccion Personal