Rating Explanation
Victoria Lods
Victoria Groetsch-Lods is visible in the community, regularly attends party events, and maintains a consistent online presence—but her transparency as a candidate remains average due to a lack of
a fully comprehensive campaign site with stances on well known, ongoing issues. While she often speaks about welcoming press engagement and holds a degree in journalism, she has not responded to multiple
outreach attempts for interviews or questionnaires—even after asking in person whether she's been receving our emails.
Adding to the confusion is the recent shift in accessibility of the bi-weekly Republican breakfasts. Once open to the press and other political affiliations, these events are now restricted to
Republicans only, following public criticism of a primary race’s lack of visibility. This change not only limits the flow of public information but creates new uncertainty about what details from
candidate speeches—such as those given by Lods—can be responsibly shared. For a voter relying on facts rather than impressions, this leaves significant blind spots.
To her credit, Lods has clearly been doing the work and staying engaged in local government. But here’s where the gap lies: social media posts and brief mentions in party newsletters are no substitute for
a comprehensive campaign platform. Voters can’t be expected to piece together scattered updates from Facebook or recall remarks made four months ago at a breakfast meeting. As someone deeply
involved in local transparency efforts, I believe voters deserve access to something centralized—an information packet or candidate hub that clearly outlines where a candidate stands on core county issues
like the Middle Mile Broadband project, the Nabb Avenue Extension, county fiscal priorities, public health, and economic development.
It’s also worth noting that Lods may be operating within constraints beyond her control. As part of an organized party ticket, campaign strategy may play a role in limiting individual engagement—even
when a candidate may personally be more open. While that’s speculative, it’s a reasonable consideration given the dynamics at play in other local campaigns.
In short: Lods appears capable, connected, and experienced—but until her campaign provides structured, accessible documentation of her plans and policy positions, her transparency rating remains
“average”. The good news? With a few intentional steps—such as a candidate Q&A, issue page, or podcast-style interview—she could easily set herself apart as both qualified and accountable.
Click the red x at the top of this box and then scroll down down for more in-depth information and sources.