Note: There are a few ways to use this page. It mixes objective source material with light analysis and first-hand reporting so voters can choose their depth.
Where we add context or opinion, it’s to help busy voters make sense of gaps in local information.
 
    Daniel Gregoire has lived in Millville since 2012 and brings 40+ years in water/wastewater systems, quality control, and field operations. He presents himself as a hands-on, whole-systems problem-solver with leadership experience in the Knights of Columbus. His priorities: clean up the city and fix “first impressions,” hire an experienced economic development lead (funded via grants/bonds), grow the ratable base, and use pragmatic incentives so Millville competes with neighboring towns. He links storefront blight, stray shopping carts, panhandling, and homelessness to investor confidence and favors coordinated solutions with staffing, community partners, and a designated point person.
He also calls for more road repairs (with clarity on street-opening funds), a regional strategy on illegal ATVs/dirt bikes, and stronger code enforcement—including moving abandoned properties to rehab-minded owners. Internally, he argues the city is short-staffed and under-equipped; he’d seek grants (e.g., Clean Communities) for hires and a second street sweeper, with city-wide sweeping and park/street care. On communication, he wants plain-English explanations of policy changes, follow-through on public comments, and a suggestion email/box; for utilities, he prefers payment plans and tax-sale tools over shutting off water for families in hardship. His pitch: unite employees and residents, execute visibly, and make Millville competitive again.
This election is on November 4th, 2025
          Daniel Gregoire remains one of the clearer examples of how community nudging can bring otherwise camera-shy candidates into public view. He has 
          attended major events such as the Four Seasons Forum and the InformTheVoteNJ Meet & Greet, and was likely present at the Housing Authority event. 
          He did not attend the recorded Candidates Forum, citing a prior family commitment for his step-daughter—an understandable explanation given the last 
          minute nature of the event, but still results in 
          one less opportunity for voters to hear from him directly.
          
          Gregoire’s cooperation with InformTheVoteNJ—providing written responses and sitting for a camera-less interview— anchors his a bit above average standing. 
          Those interactions produced tangible, testable proposals: hiring an economic-development lead, improving the abandoned-property pipeline, 
          experimenting with water-bill collection alternatives, and launching practical neighborhood-clean-up programs. Yet the second half of the 
          campaign season brought limited public updates. Within the final two-week social-media cutoff window, there was little new information posted, 
          leaving his message largely frozen in time while more vocal candidates filled the feed.
          
          This pattern highlights an important tension. Gregoire’s hesitance with cameras amidst a crowded race is hardly unique in Millville politics—but it 
          illustrates the fragile state of local transparency overall. If citizen-driven projects like InformTheVoteNJ hadn’t been encouraging participation, 
          would voters have heard much from him at all? Would there have been a centralized meet-and-greet, an interview, or even a campaign Facebook page? 
          Gregoire’s campaign underscores how dependent voter awareness still is on outside initiative rather than consistent candidate communication.
          
          Even so, his willingness to answer questions, articulate concrete plans, and maintain a courteous rapport with the press sets him apart from some. 
          The foundation is there; the next step is embracing thorough visibility as part of the job, not an optional extra.
          
          Overall rating: A Bit Above Average — cooperative and substantive when engaged, but still emblematic of how Millville’s culture of sometimes modest, 
          camera-shy campaigning limits the flow of public information.